In the judgment today in Dryden and others (Appellants) v Johnson Matthey Plc (Respondent)  UKSC 18 the Supreme Court held, unanimously, that exposure to platinum salts that led the claimants to develop platinum salt sensitisation did give rise to a cause of action. Gordon Exall summarises the main issues. The judgment is available here. A […]
Can moral culpability be taken into account when assessing s33 discretion in an historic sexual abuse case?
By Sabrina Hartshorn GH v (1)The Catholic Child Welfare Society (Diocese of Middlesbrough) (2) The Trustees of the Middlesbrough Diocesan Rescue Society and (3) Trustees of the De La Salle Provincialate Where the court was asked to consider whether the high level of moral culpability on the part of the perpetrators and Defendants should […]
Throughout 2016 the Zenith Personal Injury Team have been busy blogging about the latest news in PI and civil procedure. Here, as the first “review of the year” are all the posts topic by topic. POSTS ON PROCEDURE This has been (as always) an interest year in relation to procedure. Vilma Vodanivic considered what happens […]
By Maxine Best It was only a matter of weeks ago that I encouraged readers to look to 2017 for any future changes to the credit hire landscape. Nevertheless, it appears I was too hasty. The case of William Powell v Babu Palani was heard on 5th September 2016 at Birmingham County Court before His […]
By Peter Yates In Stewart v Kelly Blake J dealt with an application, made by a Defendant in a personal injury claim, to adduce surveillance evidence. The ex tempore judgment – currently available only in summary form – deals with the principles to be applied in relation to ambushes and surveillance. The Claimant alleged that […]
Yesterday we held our annual personal injury update. For those who couldn’t make it (and for those who did) we thought we would do a history of the day in pictures. Justin Crossley chaired the morning session. Apparently stating (more than once) that we had won Yorkshire Chambers of the Year. Frances […]
By Joanna Hastie Court of Appeal confirms that a Claimant injured in the course of intentional criminal action is not entitled to recover damages. Facts D was a licensed taxi driver in Manchester who picked up 6 passengers, 2 of whom were the 17 year old Claimants in this case. The group had decided amongst […]