THE COURT CAN NOW ALLOCATE CASES AGAINST THE PARTIES’ WILL Tricksy little rule change that could land you on the small claims track [Deletion of CPR 26.7(3)]

PI_Bronia_Hartley By Bronia Hartley


Is it just me, or has anyone else missed the fact that para.(3) of CPR r. 26.7 (General rule for allocation) has been deleted?

Previously, CPR r.26.7(3) required the consent of the parties to the allocation of proceedings to a track with a limit lower than the financial value of the claim as assessed by the court under CPR r.26.8.

As of the 1st April 2013, para.(3) stands deleted.  It follows that the court can now allocate claims issued on or after the 1st April 2013 to a lower track, notwithstanding that the value of claim exceeds the limit for that track, without the consent of the parties.

Here is a true example of how a credit hire claim valued at over £13,000 ended up on the small claims track:

The claimant obtained default judgment for an amount to be decided by the court.  The court then allocated the claim to the small claims track ‘for disposal’, thereby placing the claimant in a position whereby he would have to present his claim for over thirteen thousand pounds’ worth of hire fees at a hearing ‘which will not normally last longer than 30 minutes’ and ‘at which the court will not normally hear oral evidence’ (26PD.12.4), with only small claims track fees to look forward to.

What should you do if you find yourself looking down at an order allocating your £10k-plus claim to the small claims track? First, utter a few expletives, then get your White Book out and refresh your memory as to 26PD.11 (Re-allocation of Claims and the Variation of Directions):



11.1 (1) Where a party is dissatisfied with an order made allocating the claim to a track he may appeal or apply to the court to re-allocate the claim.

(2) He should appeal if the order was made at a hearing at which he was present or represented, or of which he was given due notice.

(3)  In any other case he should apply to the court to re-allocate the claim.


Finally, as with any application, be sure to make your application to re-allocate promptly!

One comment

  1. […] Bronia Hartley of Zenith Chambers reviews an important rule change in The Court can now Allocate a case against the Parties’ will  […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: